Search for: "State v. So"
Results 7161 - 7180
of 117,821
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am
As a matter of English law, if a state, as principal, represents that a person had authority to act on its behalf, it will be bound by the acts of that person with respect to anyone dealing with him as an agent on the faith of that representation (Attorney General of Ceylon v Silva (AD) [1953] A.C. 461). [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 8:53 pm
As the Supreme Court explained in Clapper v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 1:41 pm
’” The Court also adopted the reasoning in Gavriiloglou v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 11:57 am
Schutte v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 10:15 am
A decision from an appeals court in the case of the Institute of Amazonian Studies against the Brazilian State (IEA v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 8:41 am
However, the Supreme Court of the United States addressed an analogous situation in Bowen v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
" United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 6:10 am
See, e.g., Krohe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
” See Donovan v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Thomas gave us the answer in his opening paragraph in his brutal dissent in Grutter v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 2:00 am
” So far, so good. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 2:00 am
” So far, so good. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 12:15 am
See Zauderer v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:42 pm
As the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit explained in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 6:35 pm
People v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 6:09 pm
However, this bill has been amended to instead deal with state employees’ allotment of time off for observance of religious holidays. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 1:20 pm
The April 12, 2023, Court of Appeals opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm
So if you think (as the voters do here) that it should be a violation of the Constitution for a state to only allow registered members of a party to vote in that party's primary, then by all means, feel free to make that argument.But the Supreme Court held back in 1990 that it was unconstitutional for states (like California) to require an open primary when that's not what the party wants. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 8:59 am
Recently, a Federal Judge in Pennsylvania decided a Motion To Dismiss in favor of the Government in the case of United States v American Health, et al. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 8:33 am
On April 3, 2023, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal issued a ruling highlighting the potential danger when employers fail to adhere to that process (Bolden-Hardge v. [read post]
