Search for: "AS PTO, LLC" Results 701 - 720 of 1,048
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2011, 8:35 am by William Carleton
If PTO accrues, then it is going to have to be paid. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 6:04 am by Matt Osenga
  Then, if one of the inventors withdraws from the LLC, the attorney can continue to represent the LLC and does not necessarily need to withdrawn from the representation completely. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:00 pm
The examiner at the PTO was typically feeble in examination, as was the patent board. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:32 am by John L. Welch
In re Les Collines, LLC, Serial No. 77871104 (August 19, 2011) [not precedential].The Board observed that, as to sound and appearance, "there is nothing even remotely similar between the marks. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 9:31 am by Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Genetics Institute, LLC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am by Marie Louise
(Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking requires particular allegations that each defendant marked: Newt LLC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am by Marie Louise
(Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking requires particular allegations that each defendant marked: Newt LLC v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Thus, in evaluating any of the PTO examiner statements, it is important to know when the statements were made. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:21 am by John L. Welch
In re de Ferran Motor Sports Holdings, LLC, Serial No. 77702401 (July 27, 2011) [not precedential]. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 11:35 pm by Marie Louise
PTO does not appear to invalidate very many gene patent method claims (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog) US: Machine-or-transformation test after Myriad: Implications to the prosecution of process claims (Patent Law Practice Center) US: Unsuccessful Qui Tam plaintiff asserting false marking claim not immune from costs award: Promote Innovation v Roche Diagnostics (Docket Report) US: FDA releases two medical device draft guidances (FDA Law Blog) US: BIO: Unleashing the promise of biotechnology… [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:57 pm by Lara
”  The Flying Burrito, LLC (FBL) operates an unrelated FLYING BURRITO restaurant in Iowa. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:28 pm
Cir. 2007), and (2) meaningful preparation to conduct potentially infringing activity, Cat Tech LLC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:29 am by John L. Welch
In re A-Fab, LLC, Serial No. 77639815 (July 11, 2011).The marks were close enough. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 2:55 am by John L. Welch
[The PTO did not refuse registration on the ground that the applied-for mark is a "phantom" mark.]Applicant Lorillard claimed registrability under Section 2(f). [read post]