Search for: "Ani v. State"
Results 701 - 720
of 134,694
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2024, 5:27 am
Adding to these challenges is the adoption by the Supreme Court of the “Major Questions Doctrine” in the 2022 case West Virginia v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 4:12 am
Johnson v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:01 am
Fisher v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Citing the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Ryan v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:00 pm
It’s true that CFPB v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 3:44 pm
Shande v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 2:09 pm
From Tilley v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:33 pm
KATHY DEASY, Appellant, v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:39 am
In Smith v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:23 am
Under the ICC’s founding principle of complementarity, a case is “inadmissible” if it is being “investigated or prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution” (Rome Statute art. 17(1)(a)). [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:52 am
Section 127.304(i) explicitly states “the decision of the [SBA’s Director for Government Contracting] to decline certification is the final agency decision. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:20 am
., LLC v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 7:03 am
From Luke v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 7:00 am
v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am
In considering a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the court must afford the pleading a liberal construction, accept the facts as alleged in the pleading as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87; Bumpus v New York City Tr. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am
In considering a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the court must afford the pleading a liberal construction, accept the facts as alleged in the pleading as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87; Bumpus v New York City Tr. [read post]
22 May 2024, 5:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:03 am
Group 48, LP v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am
In other words, Alito is who he always was, and the "Concerned Alumni of Princeton," with their focus on white-male success, was a perfect fit for him.2) When the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decided Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 3:09 am
Brandon Dale Woodruff v. [read post]
