Search for: "BARNETT v. STATE"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,211
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2012, 9:48 am
As Randy Barnett and Jeff Rosen have recognized, the Chief Justice’s tax-power analysis in NFIB v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:56 pm
After all, everyone knows the peyote case — Employment Division v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am
The ACLU praised last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 4:57 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:46 pm
Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:14 pm
Before last week, I know of no legal authority in the United States who claimed to hold this position. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:25 pm
NFIB v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
In Parks v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
But "Ohio State" has echoes of one of the key cases cited in support of the mandate: the 1942 decision in Wickard v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 10:00 am
This week at the NMCCA: The Navy-Marine Corps CCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 9:39 am
In Barnett v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 10:00 am
Wednesday, June 13: United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 12:42 pm
United States. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm
Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionAmicus brief of ARC of DallasAmicus brief of Cato InstituteAmicus brief of United States Attorneys General et al.Amicus brief of American Center for Law and JusticeAmicus brief of Gathie Barnett Edmonds and Marie Barnett SnodgrassAmicus brief of National Legal FoundationReply of petitioners ________________________________________________________________ The following petitions have been re-listed for the Conference of June 7. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 10:00 am
June 7, 2012: United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Barnett. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Barnett. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:32 am
So too did a number of state governments and members of Congress. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:43 am
In Coleman v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:01 am
(Randy Barnett) On TNR.com, Jeff Rosen has a thoughtful response to the criticism engendered by his New Republic magazine essay on Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
