Search for: "Bear Productions, Inc." Results 701 - 720 of 3,603
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2010, 9:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
The products subject to this recall may or may not bear the N.Y. [read post]
19 May 2008, 9:41 pm
 The pork cracklings were produced at Sofia Chicharones, Inc., a Miami, Florida firm. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 12:21 pm by News Desk
The recalled products may have been sold by various retailers, either clerk-served or in smaller packages, with or without a label that may not bear the same brand, product name or best before date. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 6:39 pm by News Desk
” The products subject to recall bear establishment number “EST. 40009” inside the USDA mark of inspection. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 3:14 am
The evidence included other similar products bearing an "E" in various forms.Finally, the evidence showed that Vitamin E is associated with significant health benefits, and therefore its presence or absence as an ingredient would be relevant to the decision of consumers to purchase Applicant’s supplements. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 2:41 am by John L. Welch
Petitioner submitted three invoices showing sales of its product, the invoices bearing the ULTRA-CLEAN mark, [The hyphen was deemed immaterial - ed.] and respondent admitted that the goods were shipped in three separate shipments in December 2006. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 2:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
PharmaCare US, Inc., No. 16-56301, No. 16-56710, --- Fed.Appx. ----, 2018 WL 1633011 (9th Cir. [read post]
4 May 2018, 9:38 pm by News Desk
The recalled products all bear the establishment number “EST. 4800” inside the USDA mark of inspection. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by News Desk
The lot included 896 pounds of cheese and was distributed to HoQ restaurant in Des Moines, the Bear Restaurant in Ankeny, Wine Experience in West Des Moines, Fareway in Newton, Lomar Distributing, Inc. in Des Moines or purchased directly from Maytag Dairy Farms. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
And,TCCC thus concedes that ZERO is, to some extent, descriptive.The only relief Royal Crown seeks in its oppositionsto TCCC’s applications is that TCCC be required todisclaim the term ZERO. (...)If the Board concludes that Royal Crown has not metits burden to demonstrate the genericness of TCCC’sZERO-bearing marks, TCCC will need to demonstrate theacquired distinctiveness of its marks—that, “in the mindsof the public, the primary significance of a product… [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 2:40 pm by Bill Marler
The products subject to recall bear establishment number “EST. [read post]
16 May 2012, 9:34 am by admin
Customers buy products and services bearing the trademark. [read post]