Search for: "CAMPBELL v CAMPBELL"
Results 701 - 720
of 3,320
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2018, 10:31 am
Jordan, Alicia Keys, Tyra Banks, and Naomi Campbell, who has in the past chastised the fashion industry for its historic lack of black representation, saying, of black models, ‘We don’t want to be a trend. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:31 am
Jordan, Alicia Keys, Tyra Banks, and Naomi Campbell, who has in the past chastised the fashion industry for its historic lack of black representation, saying, of black models, ‘We don’t want to be a trend. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:31 am
Jordan, Alicia Keys, Tyra Banks, and Naomi Campbell, who has in the past chastised the fashion industry for its historic lack of black representation, saying, of black models, ‘We don’t want to be a trend. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:18 am
See Bridget M v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 4:42 pm
This critique follows on from my previous post, in which I responded to Paul Wragg’s criticism of the manner in which the judge in Richard v BBC dealt with the first stage of the claim – whether Richard had a “reasonable expectation of privacy” in respect of the information broadcast about him. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:59 pm
Jordan, Alicia Keys, Tyra Banks, and Naomi Campbell, who has in the past chastised the fashion industry for its historic lack of black representation, saying, of black models, ‘We don’t want to be a trend. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:59 pm
Jordan, Alicia Keys, Tyra Banks, and Naomi Campbell, who has in the past chastised the fashion industry for its historic lack of black representation, saying, of black models, ‘We don’t want to be a trend. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:59 pm
Jordan, Alicia Keys, Tyra Banks, and Naomi Campbell, who has in the past chastised the fashion industry for its historic lack of black representation, saying, of black models, ‘We don’t want to be a trend. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 3:55 pm
" Marlow v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 8:12 am
Here: ny ad opinion [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 12:11 am
*A recent case from the IP Enterprise Court has the answer - Frank Industries PTY Ltd v Nike Retail BV [2018] EWHC 1893 (Ch)Frank Industries owns a UK and an EU mark for LNDR in relation to “clothing” including “sportswear”. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 4:52 pm
There are three reasons why I think the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC is wrongly decided. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 10:29 pm
In Polara Engineering Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:00 pm
McIntyre Machinery v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:33 pm
Campbell Co. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 3:06 pm
Notably, the court relied mostly on what is still the leading Supreme Court case on parody, namely Campbell v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:46 am
The appeals court affirmed the district court’s judgment refusing to set aside the verdict (Campbell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:55 am
The decision by the Kentucky Supreme Court last summer and its case, Indiana Insurance Company v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:00 am
Arlin Campbell v. [read post]
