Search for: "California v. Davis" Results 701 - 720 of 1,690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2022, 3:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer” (Attallah v Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, LLP, 168 AD3d 1026, 1028 [2d Dept 2019]; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435 [2007]). [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 11:43 pm by Paul Krantz
Code, §§ 1001-1001.9, 1001.50-1001.55; Davis v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In Part One, we laid out the larger First Amendment framework in which the dispute might be located and discussed how the Court’s language and reasoning in Hazelwood School District v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
Christopher Meyer looks at the impact of last Term’s decision in Baker Botts v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 3:40 am by Broc Romanek
Here’s news from Davis Polk’s Ning Chiu: The SEC announced a whistleblower award of nearly half a million dollars to a former company officer whose report of misconduct resulted in an SEC enforcement action. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 7:21 am
Pacific Ranch Homeowners Association v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:35 am by Adam Chandler
” In the Boston Globe and (separately) at ACSblog, Martha Davis criticizes the result in Flores-Villar v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 10:52 am by Sean Wajert
Davis, 691 F.3d at 1162 (quoting Lavie, 129 Cal. [read post]