Search for: "Chancellor v. State" Results 701 - 720 of 1,369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2015, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
Delaware Court Looks “Beyond the Purpose Clause” Just last week, in Meyer Natural Foods LLC v Duff, C.A. [read post]
29 May 2015, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The materials sought related to the investigation of two complaints filed with the Office of the Special Commissioner of Investigation for the New York City School District (SCI) concerning whether a speech that was given by an employee of the New York State Department of Education (DOE) at a public high school and later reproduced on DOE's website violated Chancellor's Regulations D-130(I)(B)(2), (I)(B)(8), and (I)(C)(1). [read post]
27 May 2015, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
(see CPLR 217[1]; see also Matter of Biondo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 60 NY2d 832, 834 [1983]). [read post]
14 May 2015, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Court of Appeals noted that the Correction Law sets out eight factors that a public agency or private employer must consider when deciding whether one of the §752 exceptions applies:"(a) The public policy of this state, as expressed in this act, to encourage the licensure and employment of persons previously convicted of one or more criminal offenses. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:41 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” Laster then added a note of modesty, with his observation that “to state the obvious, this is the opinion of one trial judge. [read post]
6 May 2015, 11:27 am by Sebastian Brady
Reuters adds that Russian President Vladimir Putin and German Chancellor Angela Merkel will discuss the Ukrainian crisis in talks on Sunday. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 3:04 pm
" The Court said a presumption of administrative preclusion is also supported by United States v. [read post]
Court of Appeal The Chancellor’s decision was overturned at the Court of Appeal and OA’s appeal allowed. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am by INFORRM
US states are considering tightening regulations. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 7:24 pm
Then follows an alternative provision that in default of appointment the property shall go unto such person or persons living at the death of the said party of the first part, and being her heir or heirs at law, as would be entitled to take the same by descent from her in case the same was land belonging to her, situate in the state of New York, and, if more than one person, then in the proportion in that behalf prescribed by the laws of said state. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 6:57 am by Carl Neff
This question was answered in the negative by the recent decision of Fuchs Family Trust v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:53 pm by Giles Peaker
The problem here was the high threshold of evidence set out in R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor [2014] EWHC 218 (Admin), reported at [2014] ICR 498, R (Tabbakh) v Staffordshire and West Midlands Probation Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 827, and the second Unison case, R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor (No. 2) [2014] EWHC 4198 (Admin). [read post]