Search for: "Cox v. Cox"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2015, 6:17 am
Chevron Corp ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2015-11-14: Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2015-11-07: Comp… https://t.co/PYZfrGKN8M -> Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2015-11-14 https://t.co/LScl1xYP35 -> Why Microsoft’s ‘Data Trustee’ Model is a Potential Game-changer in the Privacy War https://t.co/RRlgyU5kmq -> Privacy groups warn a new Safe Harbor will be struck down https://t.co/r5cs0ZWbaK -> Implementation of Trademarks Act amendments pushed… [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 3:00 am
Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and Cox v Ministry of Justice, heard 12-13 October 2015. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and Cox v Ministry of Justice, heard 12-13 October 2015. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm
(When it later moved the INS from the Department of Justice to DHS, Congress transferred this and other authorities from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.)When the Texas v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 9:41 am
The investigation by the FCC Enforcement Bureau determined that Cox’s electronic data systems were breached in 2014 by a hacker who pretended to be from Cox’s information technology department and convinced both a Cox customer service representative and Cox contractor to enter their account IDs and passwords into a fake, or “phishing,” website. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and Cox v Ministry of Justice, heard 12-13 October 2015. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and Cox v Ministry of Justice, heard 12-13 October 2015. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 9:17 am
FTC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am
” Hill v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 1:28 pm
Cox dated April 18, 2015, a Feminists United member expressed the anger and despair that she and other members of Feminists United had about the administration’s inaction in the face of threats to Ms. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 8:03 pm
Rose, JD, MBA, Principal, Rachel V. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:13 am
Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and Cox v Ministry of Justice, heard 12-13 October 2015. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 3:38 pm
The new provisions give voice to the admonition in Imble v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 4:45 pm
This is hardly surprising, since it was Judge Leval who wrote the 1990 article that coined the term transformative use and had such an influence on the Supreme Court in its 1994 decision in Campbell v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 8:03 am
Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and Cox v Ministry of Justice, heard 12-13 October 2015. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Accordingly, the Appellate Division ruled that as McLaughlin failed to establish that an exception to the exhaustion doctrine was applicable, Supreme Court should have denied her petition and dismissed the proceeding on the merits.Additionally, in Cox v Subway Surface Supervisors Association, et al., 69 AD3d 438, the Appellate Division, addressing a union’s duty of fair representation, said:1. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 4:02 am
On Monday 12 October 2015 the Supreme Court will hear the conjoined appeals of Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and Cox v Ministry of Justice concerning the test of vicarious liability for employers. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 9:37 am
Cox New Jersey Appeals Court Reverses Anti-Harassment Order Based on Emails – E.L. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:15 am
Ricketts too is now “on the radar” in the Family Court, particularly since the case of London Borough of Islington v Al Alas and Wray [2012] EWHC 865 (Fam), which was major news in April 2012 (exactly the time the care proceedings were likely to have been commenced in this case) and really raised the profile of rickets as a potential cause of injuries that might otherwise be thought suspicious. [read post]
