Search for: "Diamond v State"
Results 701 - 720
of 991
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2021, 12:41 pm
Clark v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 9:17 am
Diehr, 450 U.S. 175, 188 (1981) and State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:41 pm
Clark v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:41 pm
Clark v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 4:27 am
Below, I share some thoughts on recent decisions.Court Enforces “Buyer Beware” Disclaimer at AuctionWhen sellers expressly say that they are not making any representations about the quality of their wares, courts are reluctant to hold sellers accountable in litigation when buyers feel deceived with their purchases.For example, in a recent case, the state appellate court in Manhattan considered whether a buyer of a Russian medal could sue an auction house once he discovered the… [read post]
7 May 2008, 8:20 pm
At the same time, in a case called Diamond v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 11:49 am
In Garrison v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:13 pm
Marko v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 11:12 am
In 1981, in its decision in Diamond v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 7:13 am
ALASKA STATE RESOURCES AGING Alaska Commission on Aging P.O. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
– All-Party Parliamentary IP Group (IPKat) United States US General On hiring an employee of your competitor: Bimbo Bakeries v. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am
Q: On April 21, 2022, the Supreme Court in Cassirer v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 9:02 am
Ever since the Supreme Court’s 1980 decision in Diamond v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:28 am
Then in Diamond v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:05 am
Jonathan V. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 6:02 am
The Court’s subsequent denial of certiorari in Eichorn v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 8:00 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 8:00 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:56 am
Both Diamond and Ink expressly represented that they had not based their decisions on the work’s artistic merit or message. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
Indus., Ltd. v. [read post]
