Search for: "Doe v. Baker" Results 701 - 720 of 1,707
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2014, 12:27 pm by Donald Ward
Stat. 456.059) is permissive and like the Baker Act, it does not create an affirmative duty. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
The recent ruling of Mr Justice Baker in AB v Ministry of Justice ([2014] EWHC 1847 (QB)) provides an interesting addition to the limited case law in this area, in particular on the issue of compensation for distress caused by the defendant’s failure to respond appropriately to an SAR. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 4 December 2018 the Court of Appeal (Irwin, Newey and Baker LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Ali v Channel 5. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 12:39 am by Eleonora Rosati
Such an exercise makes absolutely no sense and completely ignores the principle that copyright does not exist to protect against the use by others of the content embodied in the work (Baker v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
And, in Murphy v Callinan [2018] IESC 59 (30 November 2018) [36]-[44], Baker J (Clarke CJ and Dunne J concurring) in the Supreme Court approved Feeney J’s analysis in Collins (I will return to this case in a future post). [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 10:53 am
Code ch. 36-9-23 does not authorize a municipality to collect a delinquent sewer bill by any other means. [read post]