Search for: "Does 1-37" Results 701 - 720 of 5,249
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2005, 11:01 am
"When a revocation does not revoke. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 12:50 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Rather, in Question 1 and Question 2 (following the working translation provided by the CJEU; C-795/23), the Court asked (emphasis added):1. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 1:56 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The Delhi High Court decided the section 34 petition in favour of the respondent, against which the Union of India appealed to the Supreme Court under section 37 of the Act.Issue: Maintainability of the section 34 petition and the related issue as to whether or not Kuala Lumpur was the seat/place of arbitration, which in turn would determine whether Indian courts had supervisory jurisdiction over the arbitral award (note: in a foreign-seated arbitration, the supervisory jurisdiction of… [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:36 am by emagraken
 In allowing the exam Master Bouck provided the following reasons: [37]         In this case, I find that Dr. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
  The only changes from the version published in the subcommittee’s agenda book were:  (1) a new sentence in Note for Rule 26(b)(1) encouraging computer search technology (that is to say, predictive coding), and (2) modifying the Note for Rule 37(e) concerning the role of prejudice in subsection (e)(2). [read post]
1 Oct 2006, 11:40 am
  Instead, they are testing an "average" person who does not exist. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:02 am by Lawrence Taylor
Yet another example of how breathalyzers are not actually testing you, but rather an "average" person who does not exist. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:31 pm by Bill Marler
., and John Doe Corporation (lettuce producer), on behalf of Zachary Nitz and Ebone Colbert-Taylor. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 am by Anna Maria Stein
By decision of 18 November 2022 the examiner refused the application pursuant to Article 7(1)(b) and to Article 7(2) EUTMR. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:57 am
Per 37 CFR § 2.142(d), “exhibits attached to a brief that were not made of record during examination are untimely, and will not be considered. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:11 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
1 We review de novo the Board’sultimate claim constructions and any supporting determinations based on intrinsic evidence. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 12:10 pm
The second registration is probably the one which Luke alludes to in Acts 5:37, in speaking of the rebel Judas the Galilean. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
Several months ago, I wrote about a frequent litigant, in connection with a federal case of hers in in which (1) she was first allowed to proceed pseudonymously but then (2) was depseudonymized by the judge after evidence related to her past cases had emerged. [read post]