Search for: "Does 1-4 v. United States Attorney Office" Results 701 - 720 of 1,996
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Fast forward to 2019:  OIL attorneys simply cannot keep up quite as easily as before with the flood of immigration class actions and suits seeking to enjoin Executive Branch decisions to terminate Temporary Protected Status, DACA, and employment authorization for F-1 foreign students, and institute family-separation and child-imprisonment not to mention DOJ lawsuits asking federal courts to allow withholding of grant funds to sanctuary cities and states. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Fast forward to 2019:  OIL attorneys simply cannot keep up quite as easily as before with the flood of immigration class actions and suits seeking to enjoin Executive Branch decisions to terminate Temporary Protected Status, DACA, and employment authorization for F-1 foreign students, and institute family-separation and child-imprisonment not to mention DOJ lawsuits asking federal courts to allow withholding of grant funds to sanctuary cities and states. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:45 am by Dennis Crouch
§ 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the United States Patent and Trademark Office incurs when its employees, including attorneys, defend the agency in Section 145 litigation. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
United States The ABA Journal reports that a Federal Judge has dismissed a libel claim in the case of Folta v New York Times, Case 1:17cv246-MW-GRJ, hold that a University of Florida professor’s emails are public records that trigger the state’s fair reports privilege. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Jonathan Shaub
She does not have any legal basis, no valid U.S. passport, no right to a passport, nor any visa to travel to the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 6:19 am by MBettman
United States v Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 755 (1987). [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 11:10 am by MBettman
United States v Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 755 (1987). [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 8:12 am
Exh. 1 — Policy Form SH 23 25 01 06 at 1, §1(2)(c)). [read post]
Less than twenty-four hours later, some franchisors (mostly different ones than those who received the information demands) entered into agreements with the Washington State Attorney General’s Office to remove such clauses from their franchise agreements. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:33 pm by Bona Law PC
KG v Commission of the European Communities, Case 26-76: 1) the goods the company resells require a selective distribution system; 2) the company’s resellers are appointed based on objective and qualitative criteria that are applied in a non-discriminatory fashion and; 3) the restrictions do not go beyond what is necessary. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
No doctor’s office provides all treatments and all remedies for all patients as does a lawyer’s office try to do for all clients. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:36 pm by Lev Sugarman
Thursday, Jan. 24 at 4:00 p.m.: The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace will host a launch of its Middle East Center’s report, Arab Horizons: Pitfalls and Pathways to Renewal. [read post]
A property owner sought a demolition permit (for an existing dilapidated home) and design approval for an eight-unit multi-family building. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
Plaintiffs advance at least five distinct theories of how they have been, or will be, injured due to the addition of a citizenship question on the 2020 census, namely: (1) diminished political representation, both between and within states; (2) loss in government funds, again both between and within states; (3) harm to the sovereign interests of state and local governments caused by degradation of the census data upon which they rely; (4) diversion of… [read post]