Search for: "Duke v. United States" Results 701 - 720 of 976
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2018, 2:30 am by Kelly Kennington
  I remember feeling so frustrated by my history education to that point and angry that I knew practically nothing about the system of chattel slavery that existed for so much of the history of the European colonies in America and the United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
United States On 15 March 2023, the Colorado Attorney General’s Office finalised the rules implementing the Colorado Privacy Act. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 12:00 am by John Coyle
The Essay contains a host of additional insights that will (fingers crossed) help to reinvigorate the field of private international law in the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
In the same statement, Chew also explained that the ban was “ironic” because “the freedom of expression on TikTok reflects the same American values that make the United States a beacon of freedom. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm by Bexis
  There've been a raft of good decisions, although none from the United States Supreme Court, for all us practitioners on the right (in more ways than one) side of the “v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am by INFORRM
United States A federal judge has dismissed a defamation lawsuit filed by former President Donald Trump against CNN. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-419, three-time relist and quondam rescheduled case, asks whether “the pretrial restraint of a criminal defendant’s legitimate, untainted assets (those not traceable to a criminal offense) needed to retain counsel of choice violates the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:35 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
  Frequently, Dean Chemerinsky argues appellate cases, including in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:23 am by Russell Jackson
  The trial court first considered and rejected their argument that the court could not reach the merits when deciding the motion, quoting Dukes v. [read post]