Search for: "Eli Lilly " Results 701 - 720 of 2,131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2015, 7:30 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
Actos Bladder Cancer Lawsuits Continue to Increase There are more than 4,000 federal personal injury, product liability lawsuits pending against Takeda Pharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:35 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
A federal jury in Lafayette, Louisiana, last year awarded a massive $9 billion in damages against Takeda and Eli Lilly & Co. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 8:49 am
Opening Address: Professor Emily Michiko Morris, IU McKinney School of Law, The Changing Landscape in Biopharmaceuticals 9:00 - 10:15 Panel One: University Tech Transfers in BioPharma Chad Pittman, Vice President, Purdue Research Foundation James Myers, JD, PhD, Eli Lilly Professor Greg Dolin, University of Baltimore School of Law Moderator: Constance Lindman, Partner, SmithAmundsen 10:30 - 11:45 Panel Two: Legal Issues in Clinical Trials (US and Asia) Professor Rebecca S. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 8:03 am
Opening Address: Professor Emily Michiko Morris, IU McKinney School of Law, The Changing Landscape in Biopharmaceuticals 9:00 - 10:15 Panel One: University Tech Transfers in BioPharma Chad Pittman, Vice President, Purdue Research Foundation James Myers, JD, PhD, Eli Lilly Professor Greg Dolin, University of Baltimore School of Law Moderator: Constance Lindman, Partner, SmithAmundsen 10:30 - 11:45 Panel Two: Legal Issues in Clinical Trials (US and Asia) Professor Rebecca S. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:13 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
A federal jury in Lafayette, Louisiana, last year awarded a massive $9 billion in damages against Takeda and Eli Lilly & Co. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:41 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
The company’s main goal was “to protect the product,” Miller added. 4,000 Actos Bladder Cancer Lawsuits in Federal Court There are more than 4,000 product liability lawsuits filed against Takeda Pharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly, which allege that Actos diabetic medication caused patients to develop bladder cancer. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 5:58 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - An Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company ("Lilly") of Indianapolis, Indiana filed an intellectual property lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC ("Fresenius") of Lake Zurich, Illinois infringed the patented product ALIMTA®, Patent No. 7,772,209, which has been registered by the U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 8:19 pm
The answer is not clear-cut but as a general rule the post-filing data can only be ‘confirmatory’ of disclosure in the specification.As an aside, it is worth mentioning Human Genome Sciences v Eli Lilly where the main issue was how much data is required in the specification to support therapeutic use of an antibody to a new protein (see Katpost here).Why is it important to claim broadly in biotech? [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 12:16 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
The company’s main goal was “to protect the product,” Miller added. 4,000 Actos Bladder Cancer Lawsuits in Federal Court There are more than 4,000 product liability lawsuits filed against Takeda Pharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly, which allege that Actos diabetic medication caused patients to develop bladder cancer. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 1:53 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana - All federal criminal charges against Guoqing Cao and Shuyu Li, who were formerly employed by Eli Lilly and Company ("Lilly"), were recently dropped by federal prosecutors, who stated that "additional information" had been received that altered "the investigative facts initially relied upon by the government" in its case against Cao and Li. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Michael William McConnell of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, arguing on behalf of plaintiffs-appellees Bard and Goldfarb, won an affirmance of a District of Arizona finding of willfulnessin patent infringement. [ BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - In conjunction with co-counsel, an Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging infringement by Sandoz Inc. of Princeton, New Jersey of ALIMTA®, Patent No. 7,772,209, which was issued by the U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 12:26 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana - In conjunction with co-counsel, an Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana, Eli Lilly Export S.A. of Geneva, Switzerland (collectively, "Lilly") and Acrux DDS Pty Ltd. of West Melbourne, Australia sued for patent infringement in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC of Bridgewater, New Jersey, infringed its patented product Axiron®, for which… [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 8:55 pm by Patent Docs
Eli Lilly and Company et al. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm by Patent Docs
Eli Lilly and Company v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 10:29 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Judge Sleet found issues with four of the five Cubist patents related to daptomycin.As to the '967 patent:The court notes initially that several of Cubist's counterarguments as to whythe Woodworm article does not anticipate are more appropriately directed at anobviousness inquiry. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
Among the significant –- but, really, very-well indexed –- number of issues, the decision delves into novelty, inventive step, insufficiency by excessive claim breadth, added matter, and claim construction in light of the influential Actavis v Eli Lilly, another Arnoldian decision that the very same judge clarifies further in this ruling. [read post]