Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE"
Results 701 - 720
of 30,456
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2007, 1:32 am
Nationwide and In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation -- I would flat out drop my red Yellowstone mug of decaf with the white moose silhouette in amazement if the result were any different in State Farm's interlocutory appeal of Tuepker v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 10:39 am
WELLS FARGO ADVISORS, LLC. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
State’s removing a private lawsuit from State court to Federal court waives a State’s 11thAmendment immunity but may not affect its general sovereign immunity Beaulieu v State of Vermont, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, Docket #13-4198-cv704 current and former employees of the State of Vermont [Plaintiffs], brought an action in State court contending that because their weekly pay is or was reduced for partial-day… [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 8:55 am
In Mempa v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:25 am
Image via WikipediaIn Thomas John Salzano v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:16 pm
Here is the abstract: In 1874, the Supreme Court held in Murdock v City of Memphis that it lacked “jurisdiction” to review a state supreme court’s interpretation of state law, even in cases that present federal-law claims. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 3:23 pm
Co. v. [read post]
United States v. Fosler: CAAF holds Article 134 adultery sample specification fails to state offense
8 Aug 2011, 11:53 pm
Is Parker v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:00 am
In Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:34 am
In Salzano v. [read post]
6 Oct 2006, 12:49 pm
Debro v. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
Halcon Energy Properties, Inc., No. 13-2812 (Aug. 16, 2013), the Court addressed the two exceptions to the Class Action Fairness Act that permits remand to state courts of class action complaints over which the federal courts would otherwise have jurisdiction. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 9:56 am
In Hively v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 9:43 pm
In the absence of specific evidence suggesting that the accounts were created for the purpose of the purchase, their mere use for that purpose would not be relevant in determining whether they gave a true and fair picture of the financial state of the group. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:35 pm
See Girl Scouts of Manitou Council, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:38 am
State v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 10:02 am
SENTENCINGUnited States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In Fitzpatrick v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 9:31 am
The Third Circuit adopted the second element in Marcus v. [read post]
