Search for: "HAIR v. STATE"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,762
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2020, 10:52 pm
See Febre v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
” At SSRN, Jesse Snyder and Andrew Gann look at the implications of last term’s decision in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 8:39 am
Maxbounty CA Appeals Court: Claims Under State Spam Statute Not Preempted by CAN-SPAM – Hypertouch v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 5:07 am
” Briefly: At The Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen summarizes the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 11:55 am
In Wurdemann v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 11:55 am
In Wurdemann v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:18 am
” At FiveThirtyEight, Amelia Thomson-DeVeaux looks at last Tuesday’s oral argument in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 1:11 pm
Further, even after recreational marijuana was legalized in the state in 2016, a 2018 California Supreme court ruling in Ross v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:31 pm
Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Zombie Righthaven Golan v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 12:21 pm
The Court, however, relied on its recent decision in Famous Horse Inc. v. 5th Ave. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:45 pm
In the 2008 case U.S. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 7:49 pm
A wig, make up, and fake facial hair is not "light disguise," as the government states. [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:30 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 2:23 pm
The Ninth, happily, does not.United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
(Jones v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 3:52 pm
” West v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 8:22 am
New York’s unique approach likely stems from Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 12:13 am
For example, when Dr Shola Mos-Shogbamimu celebrated Africa Day in a Twitter post and commented “Proudly African from the roots of my hair to the soles of my feet. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
See Bowen v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:41 pm
At this time, AB 5 is the only legislative vehicle still in play regarding Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]