Search for: "Hodges v. Hodges" Results 701 - 720 of 1,670
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2015, 5:00 am by Radhika Kapila, Olswang LLP
On 19 October 2015, the Supreme Court heard the appeal of Kennedy v Cordia (Services) LLP (Scotland). [read post]
The lead judgment was given by Lord Wilson, with whom Lord Hodge and Lord Carnwath agreed; a concurring judgment was given by Lord Carnwath with whom Lord Reed and Lord Hughes agreed; a concurring judgment was also given by Lord Hodge with whom Lord Hughes agreed. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:45 am
Hodges, both 5-4 decisions extending constitutional protection to the marriage of same-sex couples. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:46 am by Tobin Admin
To do so would allow criminal offenders to use their own criminal proceedings to expand their rights to a tort cause of action outside of the prescribed two-year statute of limitation, Judge Hodges opined. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 3:34 am by David Whitehead
A panel of five justices comprising Lord Neuberger, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hodge heard the appeal on 8 June 2016, and judgment was handed down on 27 July 2016. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 6:56 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Valeant identifies these individuals as attorney Georgianna Braden and paralegal Alissa Hodges. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote about the dignity of same-sex marriage in Obergefell v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 2:58 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
While Lord Hodge and Lord Sales call this the duty nexus question, Lord Leggatt refers to this as a causal connection. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am by MATHILDE GROPPO
Lachaux v Independent Print, Supreme Court to hear “serious harm” appeal On Tuesday and Wednesday 13 and 14 November 2018, the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) will hear the appeal in Lachaux v Independent Print Limited & Anor UKSC 2017/0175, against the Court of Appeal decision of Davis LJ, with whom MacFarlane and Sharp LJJ concurred ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334). [read post]
However, Lord Mance and Lord Hodge expressed doubt about whether withholding clauses would always be primary obligations, Lord Hodge in particular saying “I see no principled reason why the law on penalties should be confined to clauses that require the contract-b [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 1:27 am by Laura Sandwell
The Michaelmas term starts on Thursday 3 October 2013 with Cotter v Commissioner for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, to be heard by L Neuberger, L Sumption, L Reed, L Toulson, and L Hodge. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am by Alice Grainger, Levison Meltzer Pigott
In terms of materiality, he considered the House of Lords’ decision in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v. [read post]