Search for: "In Interest of Carroll"
Results 701 - 720
of 778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2015, 2:46 pm
Jaszi: DMCA left us somewhat bruised; the next time we set out to do something useful, we asked what could be done without requiring congressional authority? [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Carroll-Byrne, 2021 NSCA 34; 2022 SCC 48 (39661) One of the defendants in the class action, Airbus S.A.S., brought an interlocutory motion before the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia seeking an order that the Transportation Safety Board release the cockpit voice recorder (“CVR”) containing the flight crew’s communications — part of the so called “black box” from the aircraft — as well as the transcripts made of the recorded data. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 8:53 am
Lawmakers interested in reforming this area of the tax code should examine each expenditure individually and first consider what kind of expenditure it is. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Supreme Court justices as opportunities to generate donations – regularly putting justices in the room with influential donors, including some whose industries have had interests before the court. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:30 pm
This post, by Karen Tani (University of Pennsylvania), is the fifth in a series of posts in which legal historians reflect on Outside In: The Oral History of Guido Calabresi (Oxford University Press), by Norman I. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm
Google added interesting things under the fourth factor. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 5:32 am
{Rebecca Carroll, When Larry Wilmore said the N-Word to President Obama, I felt Black Pride, GUARDIAN, May 2, 2016 (Perhaps the most famous instance of context mattering as to the term used in this case occurred in the spring of 2016 at the White House Correspondents Dinner when, at the end of his remarks, comedian Larry Wilmore addressed then President of the United States Barack Obama as "my nigga. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 10:47 am
Carroll v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm
’ Alice in Wonderland, by Lewis Carroll (Ch. 6)(italics in the original). [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm
Professor David Carroll has commenced a claim under section 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998 and for pre-action disclosure against Cambridge Analytica. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 4:31 pm
The plaintiff alleges that a broadcast and accompanying article defamed him including by suggesting that he was a spy who had betrayed Australia to serve the interests of a foreign power, China. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm
The Home Secretary had argued at High Court that disclosing secret documents at the inquest would damage the public interest, and Mr Justice Cranston has said he had “no hesitation” in finding the balance came down in favour of non-disclosure. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm
’ Alice in Wonderland, by Lewis Carroll (Ch. 6)(italics in the original). [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:36 pm
” Carroll Touch, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
‘Initial interest confusion’ part of EU trade mark law, says judge – EWCH decision in Och-Ziff Management Europe Ltd & Anor v Och Capital LLP & Anor (IPKat) Rooney: will his image rights income wax or wayne? [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am
The statement, which is available to read in full here, outlines how the regulators will work on areas of mutual interest and share information. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
This was approved by Sullivan CJ in the Irish Supreme Court in Sinclair v Gogarty [1937] IR 377 (see also Gallagher v Tuohy (1924) 58 ILTR 134 (Murnaghan J); Connolly v Radio Telifís Eireann [1991] 2 IR 446 (Carroll J); Reynolds v Malocco [1999] 2 IR 203, [1999] 1 ILRM 289, [1998] IEHC 175 (11 December 1998) (Kelly J)); and it represents the law in Australia (Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O’Neill [2006] HCA 46 (28 September 2006)), Canada (Champagne v Collège… [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:31 am
As Wikipedia notes, in Carroll v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 9:02 pm
(It is interesting that as it turned out both of these teams were subsequently moved to a different city. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 1:58 am
However, in this claim the issues between the parties include the truth of what was said, and whether those responsible for the offending publications honestly and reasonably believed it was in the public interest to publish it. [read post]
