Search for: "In Re Katz" Results 701 - 720 of 1,321
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2012, 9:00 pm
By Fairfax County/Northern Virginia/Maryland/Beltway criminal defense attorney Jon Katz. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 7:49 am
Gerding Edlen, Williams Dame, Tri-Met, Vera Katz, Neil Goldschmidt, Mike Lindberg, Tom Moyer, Fred Stickel -- that's a big part of why the city govermment's broke, having been looted for condos and government Shangri-La's. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 12:42 am by admin
Is this a price we’re willing to pay? [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 12:56 pm
“It’s unconscionable that we are not prioritizing the preventative pieces,” said Katz. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 7:30 pm by Orin Kerr
Indeed, the point of disagreement with the concurring opinion in Jones was the re-emergence of a trespass theory for Fourth Amendment searches rather than application of existing reasonable expectation of privacy doctrine. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:15 pm by Valerie Katz
I am sure you have seen this email (or a slight variation): RE: 1 MILLION DOLLARS DEAR VALERIE KATZ, I am writing to you because I need a lawyer to help me collect on a judgment of 1 MILLION DOLLARS. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 1:13 am
The decision is important principally because it re-affirms an enormously important principle articulated by Justice Harlan in Katz v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 1:13 am
The decision is important principally because it re-affirms an enormously important principle articulated by Justice Harlan in Katz v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:54 am by emp
Now I admit we’re way down in the legal weeds here but I read the Scalia decision – with 5 justices supporting it — as requiring a combination of Arguments 1 and 2 plus a property/trespass violation. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 10:18 am by Daniel Solove
Most of the time, when we’re out and about, nobody’s paying any special attention to us. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 12:17 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Who if you don't know what that is), found that “the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places” abandoning the "trespass" model.Scalia's opinion, though, demands that a defendant's "Fourth Amendment rights do not rise or fall with the Katz formulation" and makes the claim that "Katz did not narrow the Fourth Amendment’s scope. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:05 am by Derek Bambauer
And, it maintains the viability of Katz in other instances. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:39 am by Priscilla Smith
  Just because in 1967 Katz said that the Fourth Amendment protects more than physical trespass, doesn’t mean that the Fourth Amendment doesn’t protect physical trespass. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:49 pm
By now you're probably wondering why I keep putting quotation marks around "majority. [read post]