Search for: "In re Marks"
Results 701 - 720
of 29,950
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2014, 3:11 am
In re Parker, Serial No. 85671566 (March 17, 2014) [not precedential]. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:13 am
[Refusal to register the mark LEONESSA for wine, in view of the registered mark LEONESS CELLARS (Stylized) for "bottles of wine, namely, wine sold in bottles" [CELLARS disclaimed]].In re DNA Consulting LLC, Serial No. 85574196 (October 27, 2014) [not precedential]. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 11:04 am
The court stopped short of re-defining exactly what range of depictions should be considered, however, leaving ambiguity as to exactly what the precise broadening effect of this holding will be. [read post]
28 May 2012, 12:00 pm
A book entitled “Once You’re Lucky, Twice You’re Good” reported that Mark Zuckerberg and... [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:12 am
From Mail Online: According to the 2008 book Once You’re Lucky, Twice You’re Good, Priscilla Chan made Mark Zuckerberg sign a a document that stated they enjoy at least one date night and 100 minutes away from his apartment or... [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 2:12 am
"The third was In re Covalinski, 113 USPQ2d 1166 (TTAB 2014) [TTABlogged here], wherein the Board reversed a refusal to register the mark shown below for athletic apparel, including shirts, hats, and caps. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 2:52 am
August 6, 2019 - 11 AM: In re PCS Petroleum LLC, Serial No. 87728983 [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark KP QUIK STOP & Deign for retail convenience stores, in view of the registered mark KWIK STOP for "Retail convenience store services featuring gasoline, other petroleum products and alcoholic beverages"].August 7, 2019 - 10 AM: Park Hotel Management Pte Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 2:01 am
In re Bedgear LLC, Serial No. 87147150 (January 3, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Frances Wolfson).The Marks: The Board observed that applicant’s standard character mark may be displayed in the same font style as any of the registered marks. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:31 am
For example, in In re Chevron Intellectual Property Grp. [read post]
Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Is This "Statue of Liberty" Design Mark Scandalous Under Section 2(a)?
3 Dec 2013, 4:55 am
In re Advanced Armament Corp., LLC, Serial No. 77770899 (November 29, 2013) [not precedential].The examining attorney relied on various Internet pages and media articles regarding use of guns and/or silencers, and other material regarding the Statute of Liberty. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 3:28 am
In re Doofood, Serial No. 87370003 (September 4, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 11:31 pm
But either way we're interned out.The Wrong Way to Mount Rushmore, Mark Steyn - Opinion Journal, June 27, 2004 (Ah, those good old days of Larry Klayman, when "only" the U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:21 am
For example, in In re Metriplex Inc., 23 UPSQ2d 1315 (TTAB 1992) the computer printouts displaying the mark without disclosing the services was acceptable because it shows use of the mark as it appears on the computer terminal while in the course of rendering the services to the actual consumer.However, when a service mark is used in advertising, the specimen must show an association between the mark and the services. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 6:29 am
” In view of the Federal Circuit’s Fortney decision, businesses should re-evaluate their product packaging to determine whether color schemes employed therein are being used as source identifiers and re-consider whether pursuing federal registration is worthwhile effort. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 10:00 am
If you’re like me, you’re wondering why Tom Brady would want to register such a trademark. [read post]
9 May 2016, 3:17 am
" See In re Dietrich, 97 USPQ2d at 1637. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:14 am
Brooks Brothers.One reason put forward for false marking of some products was the use of outdated product molds put into use in China:"You're paying the hostage fee," says Mark Willard, a lawyer who represented hand-tool manufacturer Ames True Temper Co. in a suit involving a shrub rake. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 3:59 am
See In re Opus One Inc., 60 USPQ2d at 1817; In re Jeep Corp., 222 USPQ at 337. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 9:25 am
” Ariad, 598 F.3d at 1351(second alternation in original) (emphasis added) (internalquotation marks omitted); Daniels, 144 F.3d at 1456(“The [written description] inquiry is simply to determinewhether the inventor had possession at the earlier date ofwhat was claimed at the later date. [read post]
3 May 2010, 4:22 am
Re: Opposition by Lidl Stiftung & Co KG to registration of trade mark application 1200990(9) (International Registration Designating Australia No 934438) - LITL - filed in the name of Aquent LLC.Request to adjourn hearing refused; Section 44 - Trade marks deceptively similar to opponent's LIDL trade marks - Protection refused.Lidl filed a notice of opposition to the registration of the trade mark LITL in respect of Class 9: Computers; mobile… [read post]
