Search for: "Maines v. Secretary of State" Results 701 - 720 of 906
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2011, 12:02 am by Melina Padron
Quila & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45 (12 October 2011) October 13, 2011 – our post here Home Secretary’s refusal to grant visas to non-resident spouses under a certain age breached their right to family life under Article 8 of the Convention. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 12:34 pm
She does not need the consent of the full Board, or indeed of any of its members, to exercise that power -- that is one of the significant changes between the old disciplinary Canons and the new.The clincher, however, is that the current Bishop of Olympia stated on September 30 that he had become aware of the adultery allegations "several weeks ago", i.e., most likely still within the month of September, and most certainly after the Disciplinary Board's full meeting on August… [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant); R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 45 – read judgment. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
Justice Dalveer BhandariSupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in State of Haryana v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 5:29 am by Rosalind English
Updated |NS v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Principles of Community law) [2011] EUECJ C-493/10 (22 September 2011) - read opinion The Common European Asylum System was designed to establish a fair and effective distribution of the burden on the asylum systems of the EU Member States. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 1:17 am by Adam Wagner
It is accepted on all sides that the main duty of complying with the European Convention on Human Rights lies on the Governments of the member states. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
The court held that the statute did not unambiguously foreclose the Secretary's intepretation. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 10:04 am by Benjamin Wittes
The main problem with Guantánamo, we suggested, was not that the United States was detaining people as “enemy combatants” but that it was not detaining the “right people. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 10:51 am by Schachtman
(June 14, 1991) (presented by plaintiffs’ counsel Jim Pettit, of Greitzer & Locks), in Radcliff v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:44 am by GuestPost
Little over four years later the House of Lords handed down the oft-cited and widely commented upon judgment in A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (‘A’) holding that the power was incompatible with the ECHR. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 9:50 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
” Article 8 of the Rules of Arbitration and Conciliation of the International Arbitral Centre of the Austrian Federal Economic Chamber in Vienna (Vienna Rules) states:“Liability of the arbitrators, the Secretary General, the Board and its members and the Austrian Federal Economic Chamber and its employees for any act or omission in relation to arbitration proceedings, insofar as such liability may be admissible by law, shall be excluded. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:47 am by Melina Padron
Case-law commentaries from across the blogosphere: Last week the Supreme court refused to grant Heringey Council and the Secretary of State  leave to appeal the decision in Sharon Shoesmith’s case. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:36 am by Matthew Flinn
The issue of publicity more generally, and the issue of parties to an Inquiry being able to cross-examine witnesses, was addressed to some extent by the Court of Appeal in R (D) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] EWCA Civ 143, albeit in the context of an investigation into a death in custody under Article 2 of the ECHR. [read post]