Search for: "Martin v. United States" Results 701 - 720 of 2,268
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2017, 12:30 pm
United States tells us, the basis for impeachment is a political question, meaning that impeachment effectively means whatever Congress decides, and the courts will not review or challenge the determination. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:30 pm
United States tells us, the basis for impeachment is a political question, meaning that impeachment effectively means whatever Congress decides, and the courts will not review or challenge the determination. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm by Bernie Burk
  We ran into related issues during the pre-Obergefell litigation on marriage equality, when the United States Attorney General and some State Attorneys General declined to defend the constitutionality of marriage and marriage-related laws that were discriminatory, and other parties (generally representatives of legislative factions and state or local officials) stepped in to do so, with fairly limited success. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 12:46 pm by John Floyd
  On August 18, 2017, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 10:21 am by Karen Breda
 He served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York from 1982-1986, and then later as the United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 7:45 am by Brad Kuhn
 The Court explained that the United States Supreme Court is divided on whether a judicial action may constitute a taking. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 7:45 am by Brad Kuhn
 The Court explained that the United States Supreme Court is divided on whether a judicial action may constitute a taking. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
As the unanimous Court said in the 1974 Watergate Case, United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 7:38 am by NCC Staff
 “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude,” read the amendment’s first section. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  SHARON EUL et al., on behalf of themselves and a class, Plaintiffs,v.TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS et al., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:17 am by Quinta Jurecic
Robert Hannigan, Former Director, United Kingdom Government Communications HeadquartersMike Rogers, Commander, US Cyber Command; Director, National Security Agency Moderator: David Ignatius, Associate Editor and Columnist, The Washington Post   That Was ThenMichael Collins, Deputy Assistant Director, East Asia Mission Center, Central Intelligence AgencyBonnie Glaser, Senior Advisor for Asia; Director, China Power Project, Center for Strategic and International StudiesKenichiro… [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 5:28 am by Eugene Volokh
“DISH Network contracts with thousands of third-party retailers in the United States who solicit sales as authorized dealers. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 2:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
True threats, as the United States Supreme Court defines them, are “those statements where the speaker means to communicate a serious expression of an intent to commit an act of unlawful violence to a particular individual or group of individuals. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
At Just Security, Marty Lederman disputes the government’s contention in its reply brief that the connection between a foreign national and a United States person or entity “must be ‘substantial,’” calling “[t]hat adjective … a limitation of the SG’s own creation, one not found in the Court’s opinion. [read post]