Search for: "Matter of M C B" Results 701 - 720 of 3,548
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2010, 7:01 am
As to point (c), I'm sure many groups seek greater judicial accountability, but this is clearly not the place to discuss that, or any reorganisation of the judiciary. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 5:00 am by Hayley Evans, Paras Shah
Further, Afghanistan argued that the Pre-Trial Chamber has the power to consider all factors set out in Article 53(1)(c), including the interests of justice. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:25 am by David Smith
The Deputy Master who initially dealt with costs agreed with Southwark, HHJ Macduff reversed this decision on appeal and so the case came before the Court of Appeal with the Law Society joining in as an intervenor on behalf of S and M (although they were doing so more on the basis of support for B & C). [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:25 am by David Smith
The Deputy Master who initially dealt with costs agreed with Southwark, HHJ Macduff reversed this decision on appeal and so the case came before the Court of Appeal with the Law Society joining in as an intervenor on behalf of S and M (although they were doing so more on the basis of support for B & C). [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 4:43 pm
Subsection (b) The list of appealable orders is too long to retype here. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But if that’s the case, then we lose Rogers, all the expressive use considerations—there’s no 1A need b/c those doctrines are meant to protect 1A interests. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 8:58 am by Marcel Pemsel
Likewise, bad faith is also considered to potentially relate to the entire mark (Art. 59(1)(b) EUTMR). [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 8:51 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The M/Y Johanny, 36 F.3d 136, 141 n.6 (1st Cir. 1994) (quoting James W. [read post]
14 May 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the matter of an application by Siobhan McLaughlin for Judicial Review (NI), heard 30 Apr 2018. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 6:34 pm
It is not for nothing that the concept of hareem is derived from the word haram (حَرَام, ḥarām)--either forbidden- because it is evil/sinful or associated with evil/sin, or forbidden to any but those initiated into the rites and community of believers (reservedfor the sacred). [read post]