Search for: "May v. State"
Results 701 - 720
of 119,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2013, 6:26 pm
Florida v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:57 pm
E.g., Smith, 442 U.S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 1:16 pm
The district court held that the United States' condemnation extinguished California's public trust on the entire parcel, and that the 27.54 acres which are filled can be conveyed to a private party free of any trust, but that the 4.88 acres that remained tidelands at the time of the taking are now subject to a Federal public trust and may not be conveyed to a private party. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 1:27 am
Otherwise, the grant merely expresses the grantor's confidence that the grantee will use the property so far as may be reasonable and practicable to effect the purpose of the grant.The Will did not include language indicating that, if the State did not comply with the farming provision, the grant to the State would become void and revert to Hinebaugh. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:46 am
Today, the Solicitor General filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 11:20 am
" However, opined the court, "In New York ... the Legislature—not the Governor—may ordinarily define the terms on which non-constitutional state officers may be appointed and removed.Considering the Plaintiff's secondary arguments, the court decided "the Commission's placement within the Department of State does not violate Article V of the State Constitution. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 11:20 am
" However, opined the court, "In New York ... the Legislature—not the Governor—may ordinarily define the terms on which non-constitutional state officers may be appointed and removed.Considering the Plaintiff's secondary arguments, the court decided "the Commission's placement within the Department of State does not violate Article V of the State Constitution. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 8:35 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department; HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:35 am
Mann The post Ex-Employee’s Continued Use of Twitter Account May Be Conversion–Farm Journal v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
In 1995, the United States launched the first NAFTA trade challenge.[9] It was the first and only NAFTA Chapter 20 Canada-U.S. dispute as the agreement’s state-to-state provisions fell into disuse. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 7:41 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 5:01 am
Court of Appeals has just made clear in Alphonso Owens v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:37 pm
See Nevada v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 11:46 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:41 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 3:35 am
Wilkins and United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am
In support of that conclusion, the court makes this murky statement: “courts in this Circuit have repeatedly held that a plaintiff may state a claim under the Lanham Act where the defendant (1) interfered with the plaintiff’s ability to offer its own commercial services, and/or (2) used the Internet. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
