Search for: "Morales v. New York" Results 701 - 720 of 1,818
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2017, 3:41 am
Teva v Gilead, Abraxis v Comptroller and Wobben v Siemens kick of 2017's patent casesGuest post from Steven Baldwin (Allen & Overy), summarizing 2017's recent patent decisions. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 7:55 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Here, the defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the plaintiff’s use of the property violated the Town zoning law, thereby prohibiting the plaintiff from receiving a real property tax exemption pursuant to RPTL 420-a (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court heard oral argument in Endrew F. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:44 am by Richard Hunt
A December 30 opinion from the Eastern District of New York should remind businesses that the obligation to comply with the ADA does not depend on the moral quality of the plaintiff. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 11:19 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Narin's work on high citations of Japanese patents was discussed in Business Week (p. 57 of Aug. 9, 1993 issue), in the Jiji Press Ticker (May 28, 1991), Business America (Vol. 110, p. 13, Sept. 25, 1989 issue) and the New York Times (p. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Prince asked the Southern District of New York court to dismiss the case with prejudice as it was an attempt to ‘essentially re-litigate’ his controversial fair use victory against another photographer Patrick Cariou. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Even under the appropriately exacting standards of New York Times v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:47 am by Susan Hennessey, Benjamin Wittes
Tillerson has close ties with President Vladimir V. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 10:55 am by Stephen Wermiel
New York, a 1905 case in which the court struck down a labor law that limited working hours as an arbitrary limitation on freedom of contract that violated the due process clause. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
” In The New York Times, Adam Liptak surveys Trump’s list, concluding that it “manages both to reassure the conservative legal establishment and to represent a rebellion against it. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court heard oral argument in Lynch v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:17 am by Mark Walsh
Morales-Santana does not quite rise to the level of United States v. [read post]