Search for: "Owens v. State"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm
United States Ryan Larson, the man c [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:54 am
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court decided Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
” Owen v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
” Owen v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:53 pm
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 2:53 pm
" Accord State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:24 pm
Owens, No. 13-719 (U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:49 pm
Owens, 13-719, a Class Action Fairness Act case. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:11 am
“We look forward to the opportunity to persuade the court that if a state official arbitrarily denies a prisoner access to evidence for DNA testing, the prisoner should be allowed to challenge that decision in a federal civil rights lawsuit,” Owen said. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 7:30 pm
Beetson v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:45 pm
Beetson v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:38 pm
Those cases follow another similar decision from the Eighth Circuit in January of this year in Owen v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am
Owens-Illinois, Inc., et al., No. 8704-1464 (Philadelphia Cty. [read post]
8 May 2011, 12:51 am
Xavier v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 6:03 am
Owens, No. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:38 pm
Archuleta 13-607Issue: Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred by reversing the United States Merit Systems Protection Board's (MSPB) interpretation of its enabling statute and extending Department of the Navy v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 9:27 pm
Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953; Jones v. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 8:23 am
The Owen Corp., 2022 WL 386103 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022), dealing with a local licensure requirement. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:24 pm
In Moe v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:31 am
In Jacobs v Motor Insurers Bureau [2010] EWHC 231 (QB), Mr Justice Owen applied Rome II’s provisions to reach the conclusion that the compensation to be paid by the MIB (acting as the UK’s compensation body under the Fourth Motor Insurance Directive) to the claimant as a result of an accident in a Spanish shopping centre car park in December 2007 in which the other driver was German (and uninsured) should be assessed in accordance with Spanish law, as the law of the… [read post]
