Search for: "People v. Gay" Results 701 - 720 of 2,210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2009, 3:32 pm
1 And am I the only one who finds interesting that the Proponents aren’t offering to find evidence of people moving from gay unions into straight ones? [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:24 pm by Mary A. Fischer
And there was a serious question about which effort had the greater capacity to make the daily lives of gay people better. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 8:26 am
Copies are available at ALFFor more details and to download a copy please visit this site.Table Of Contents:IntroductionSchematic Guide: Naz Foundation v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 7:29 am by Priscilla Smith
(Cross-posted from Human Rights at Home blog, here)I suppose we are meant to be grateful for the Court’s opinion recognizing that discrimination against gay, lesbian and trangender people is sex discrimination under Title VII, as Andrew Koppelman explained a generation ago and discusses in a July 10th post here. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 7:31 pm
Sandwiched between high profile decisions on gay marriage and Obamacare in late June, in the case of Reed v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 5:45 am by alysondrake
She was very well-known for wearing vibrant hats, but constantly told people, “it’s what’s under the hats that count! [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 10:34 am by Jason Shinn
In fact, approximately 28 states don’t have laws prohibiting discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:50 am by William Eskridge - Guest
”  Thus, Amendment 2 denied gay people some legal rights, while Proposition 8 is completely symbolic. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  It is curated by Mary Ziegler, UC Davis School of Law (Harvard Gazette).Randall Kennedy, HLS, interviewed on Walker v. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:37 am by SHG
The Second Circuit sucked some of the wind out of those sails in Christiansen v. [read post]
  Thus, gay applicants have lost “pattern and practice” claims where evidence of treatment of LGBT people is mixed, such as claims from Peru (Salkeld v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 2:04 pm
Gay people who do not believe that their sexual orientation is innate or in accord with natural law are welcome to join, apparently, and non-gay people who believe that homosexuality is innate and morally acceptable are not welcome to join. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am by Charley
Many were surprised that the former Bush v. [read post]