Search for: "People v. Weight" Results 701 - 720 of 3,191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2015, 7:24 am by Kent Scheidegger
Supreme Court today decided the Facebook threats case, United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:59 am
Circumstantial evidence and direct evidence carry equal weight when reviewed by an appellate court. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 7:42 am
The requisite weight of the safety interest is apparent from an examination of the Supreme Court precedents on point: Skinner v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 8:18 am
Garry Michael LopezKINGS COUNTYCivil PracticeCourt Refuses to Set Aside Jury Verdict; Finding Not Inconsistent or Against Weight of Evidence Solis-Vicuna v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 1:12 am
KINGS COUNTYCriminal PracticeCourt Finds Weight of Authority, Language of §30.30, Policy Considerations Support Partial Conversion People v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:11 am by SHG
Male; black; height, 5’10” to 6’0” tall; hair color, black; weight, 155 to 180 pounds; age, 19… This would limit the search to, oh, a few thousand people. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 1:25 am
KINGS COUNTYCriminal PracticeGrand Larceny Charge Dismissed as Joint Property Owner Cannot Steal From Another Joint Owner People v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 5:12 pm by Earl Drott
While there are grounds for vacating unfavorable verdicts in car accident cases, courts do not grant such requests lightly, as demonstrated in a recent Texas case, Mark Mandel v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 9:47 am by Kevin M. Mazza, Esq.
Marital fault had to be “egregious” or have a negative effect upon the economic status of the parties to be considered, as our Supreme Court ruled in Mani v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 10:00 am by Marie-Krystel Ouellet
For certain people, adopting such a policy may have the effect of encroaching on their religious rights and protecting their own health and safety or that of other workers. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 1:04 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
For the reasons that follow, we affirm.Of the people involved:Dr. [read post]