Search for: "People v. Wells (1970)" Results 701 - 720 of 1,131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
– San Miguel Brewing International Limited v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
First, the Supreme Court held in Oncale v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am by familoo
This is the text of a Keynote address given by Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division at the Law Society’s Family Law Annual Conference ‘The sacred and the secular: religion, culture and the family courts’ on London 29 October 2013 (H/t to Adam Wagner)    Only a little over a century ago, in 1905, a judge in a family case could confidently opine that the function of the judges was “to promote virtue and morality and to discourage… [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Paula Mitchell
”  Nesselrode was on a jury that had to decide the fate of a 16-year-old accused of starting a fire at a Tuscon hotel in 1970 that killed 29 people. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am by Paul Rosenzweig
Pure privacy—that is, the privacy of activities in your own home—remains reasonably well-protected.[8] What has been lost, and will become even more so increasingly, is the anonymity of being able to act in public (whether physically or in cyberspace) without anyone having the technological capacity to permanently record and retain data about your activity for later analysis. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm by Schachtman
Schepers, who became deaf and daft, and fantasized and testified to conversations with people, long dead, who could not contradict him. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Larry Catá Backer
United States. 379 U.S. 241 (1964) (commerce power could be used to apply an anti-discrimination statute to an establishment that served people in interstate travel and that could affect national policy); Katzenbach v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:10 am by Bruce Boyden
First, take Google’s reliance on the 1973 case of United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:10 am by Bruce E. Boyden
First, take Google’s reliance on the 1973 case of United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Devlin Hartline
I think some people dismissed my post completely just based on its title—the reasoning didn’t matter since the conclusions weren’t what those people wanted to hear. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:00 am by JB
  What do you think of people who defended Jim Crow and “separate but equal” before Brown and the civil rights revolution; or people who believed, before the 1970s, that the Constitution does not guarantee women equality? [read post]