Search for: "Powell v. State" Results 701 - 720 of 1,590
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2015, 11:36 pm by INFORRM
* Cripps v Vakras – $450,000 ($100,000 aggravated damages) * Pedavoli v Fairfax Media – $350,000 – hard copy and online * Polias v Ryall – $340,000 (Facebook and gossip) * North Coast Children’s Home Inc v Martin – $250,000 * Tassone v Kirkham – $176,408.81 * Fisher v Channel Seven Sydney – $125,000 (Today Tonight) * Visscher… [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 11:30 am
State, 123 S.W.3d 82, 90 (Tex.App.2003) (reversing conviction for disorderly conduct where the defendant showed his middle finger to the driver of another vehicle while passing on a highway”); State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 7:22 am by Mark Ashton
 As I read the dissents I kept thinking about the 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:20 am by Joy Waltemath
Bakke (1978)), Justice Powell wrote in his solo opinion that the attainment of a “diverse student body” is a compelling state interest for an institution of higher education. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v Bakke (17 EPD ¶8402 (1978)), Justice Powell wrote in his solo opinion that the attainment of a “diverse student body” is a compelling state interest for an institution of higher education. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am by Schachtman
The discovery obligations with respect to statistician expert witnesses vary considerably among state and federal courts. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
As Blackmun noted in his first draft of Doe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 11:39 am by Foran & Foran, P.A.
The Maryland Court of Special Appeals recently rendered a decision in a case, Powell v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Larry was Justice Lewis Powell’s law clerk in 1972-73 when Roe v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:52 am by SHG
Just for kicks, here’s a piece from Justice Lewis Powell’s majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:59 am by Justin Bates, Arden Chambers
In Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 AC 18; [2011] HLR 23, the decision in Pinnock was held to be of general application whenever a public authority seek possession of a property that constitutes a person’s home. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 6:29 am by John Jascob
By Lene Powell, J.D.A panel of the Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a counterclaim alleging breach of fiduciary duty by directors of a California corporation with a Canadian parent company. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Adell, Razing the Forest to Kill a Tree: EEOC V. [read post]