Search for: "Quick v. United States"
Results 701 - 720
of 2,424
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2018, 8:29 pm
In any given instance when canine force is used for criminal apprehension, there is the potential for a violation of the individual’s fourth amendment rights as specified in the United States Constitution. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 4:49 am
The challenge here was one of political ideology, conservative v. socialist. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
United States, the Court split 5-4 over whether employee stock options are taxable “compensation” under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 12:47 pm
When the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:07 pm
In this post, we look at how different medical bodies, specifically those in Europe (the European Medicines Agency (EMA) ) and in the United States (the FDA) look at evidence that might be considered "clear and convincing. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:42 am
In Durham v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Citing Colony Park Assn v. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 8:07 am
The first case is United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:16 pm
The first case is United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:59 am
Additional Resources: Lay v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:59 am
Additional Resources: Lay v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 12:37 pm
Following the ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States in Bank of America Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
Gibson v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:07 pm
In a recent case heard in the United States District Court of the District of Kansas, U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:07 pm
In a recent case heard in the United States District Court of the District of Kansas, U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 3:43 pm
V. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 6:45 am
United States Department of Health and Human Services et al., in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico (No.1:16-cv-00878). [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:28 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 8:16 am
…It is of course undisputed that plaintiff sold space to Google, but that alone is insufficient to establish that plaintiff used the Klumba mark in United States commerce. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:04 am
Gay Rights: United States v. [read post]
