Search for: "R T Miller" Results 701 - 720 of 3,318
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hemming (t/a Simply Pleasure Ltd) & Ors) v Westminster City Council, heard 11 May 2017. [read post]
18 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
 . shall have the sole Power of Impeachment” and”[t]he Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments” (emphasis added). [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hemming (t/a Simply Pleasure Ltd) & Ors) v Westminster City Council, heard 11 May 2017. [read post]
9 May 2017, 5:57 am by Joe Patrice
Miller is in the running for the SDNY U.S. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Thursday 11 May, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of R (Hemming (t/a Simply Pleasure Ltd) & Ors) v Westminster City Council. [read post]
4 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
He is a co-author, along with William Cohen and Jonathan Varat, of a major constitutional law casebook, and a co-author of several volumes of the Wright & Miller treatise on federal practice and procedure. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
He is a co-author, along with William Cohen and Jonathan Varat, of a major constitutional law casebook, and a co-author of several volumes of the Wright & Miller treatise on federal practice and procedure. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 8:04 am by Robin Shea
It sounded like he just hated her because she wasn’t the person he wanted to hire. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 6:45 am by Joy Waltemath
When the second EO was signed, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer stated that ‘[t]he principles of the [second] executive order remain the same,’ the court continued. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
But Congress hasn’t taken up the invitation the justices issued in Jones to step in to address civil litigation against sitting presidents.)The second difference between Bill Clinton’s case and Donald Trump’s is the passage of time and the sense the current Supreme Court might (should) have that it erred in Jones itself. [read post]