Search for: "ROBERTS V COMMERCE" Results 701 - 720 of 1,506
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2010, 11:22 am by Ilya Somin
After all, as I explained in one of my earliest posts on Comstock, the statute upheld in that case was “rationally related” to the regulation of interstate commerce as that power was defined by the Court in cases such as Gonzales v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 7:22 am by Jay Willis
Also in the Washington Post, Robert Barnes previews Stop the Beach Renourishment v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
The argument over the extent of the power granted by the commerce clause is nothing new; anyone who has been to law school is familiar with Wickard v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
The argument over the extent of the power granted by the commerce clause is nothing new; anyone who has been to law school is familiar with Wickard v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
[vi]And then-Justice Rehnquist might have joined the majority in Washington v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 1:35 pm by Ronald Mann
In this case, by contrast, the opinion of Chief Justice John Roberts displays a confident and assertive verve, full of quotable maxims certain to populate the U.S. [read post]