Search for: "Resolute and Northern" Results 701 - 720 of 2,001
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2019, 7:00 am by Ariel I. Ahram
For all of the immediate good that the Stockholm Agreement might do, it also complicates the long-term search for conflict resolution. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 11:43 am by Kenneth Hall
A judge for the US District Court for the Northern District of California granted an injunction in the jurisdictions that challenged new rules that would have made it easier for an employer to opt-out of providing health insurance that cover female birth control. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
What does Brexit mean for data protection: part 2 The Panopticon Blog has a post about the case of Campbell v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland [2018] UKUT 372 (AAC) – Death and the DPA. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The museum includes interesting exhibits on how the League used flexible dispute resolution mechanisms to avoid deeper problems, as well as how cultural, social, and religious trends followed in the wake of the League’s activities. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:05 pm by Joe Whitworth
The unit will grow in size to 82 staff which is an increase of 60 people and operate from five locations across England, Wales and Northern Ireland. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:59 pm by Anthony Gaughan
About one million soldiers served in the Confederate armies and millions of southerners (as well as some northerners) provided material support to the Confederacy. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 11:54 am by Jeff Wurzburg (US)
At the beginning of his opinion, Judge O’Connor offered a summation of the basis for his decision: Resolution of these claims rests at the intersection of the ACA, the Supreme Court’s decision in NFIB, and the TCJA. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 6:40 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
District Court for Northern District of Texas issued his much-awaited opinion in Texas v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 9:41 am by Jim W Hildreth
I'm often asked if I travel beyond my home of Sonora for Real Estate Disputes.On a regular basis, I travel to the San Francisco Bay Area, including San Jose, Oakland, Emeryville.Upcoming is an Oakland Mediation, with the dispute being orginated in Sacramento.I just completed Mediations in Vallejo and Auburn.In 2018, I travelled to the Sacramento region 8 times.Travels have taken me to the Northern part of California, Eureka and today was asked to mediate in  Redding.I… [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 2:28 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Hockerson-Halberstadt,Inc., the court cited a “policy favoringsettlement” and “the interstate judicial system’s interestin obtaining the most efficient resolution of controversies. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 12:54 pm by Adam Feldman
The court is often described as activist for ruling on issues that could potentially find resolution through the elected branches of government. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 7:35 am by J. Dana Stuster
Security Council resolution that would voice support for a ceasefire in milder terms than even some of the administration’s own statements. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:39 am by Florian Mueller
Koh in the Northern District of California by November 14, but we're now just one month and one day away from the trial date and no agreement has been reached. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
IPSO Rulings A ruling and two resolution statements have been published by IPSO’s Complaints Committee this week: Resolution Statement 05896-18 Alexander v The Times, provision 1 (accuracy), resolved via ISPO mediation 04767-18 A Woman v Harlow Star, principles 1, 2 (privacy) and 7 (children in sex cases), no breach after investigation Resolution Statement 05309-18 Dark v express.co.uk, principle 1, resolved via IPSO mediation Statements in Open Court and Apologies… [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:24 am by Erin McCarthy Holliday
In an order on Tuesday afternoon, Northern District of California Judge Jon Tigar wrote the court could not “reasonably conclude” that the issues presented “require resolution within one day without an opportunity for the opposing parties to be heard,” citing that the defendants had waited eight days to file their motion for a stay. [read post]