Search for: "Response Brief for the United States Regarding Jurisdiction" Results 701 - 720 of 1,132
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
The two-day conferencegathered the intellectual acumen of many academic and professional leaders from Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Macau, mainland China, Netherlands, Singapore, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and  United States, to name but a few. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 2:17 pm by @travelblawg
Code § 39A “Aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft” in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:07 pm by Jim Rossi
Learjet, the Justices appeared to be divided in their questioning regarding the Natural Gas Act split of jurisdiction between the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the states. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
These developments have triggered calls for the SEC to take action with regard to fee-shifting bylaws. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 4:12 pm by Giles Peaker
Lawal had been occupying the Property as his “only or principal home” within the meaning of section 81 of the 1985 Act, Judge May had regard particularly to the following matters: (1) Mr. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:05 am by Ronald Mann
While all of that happens under state law, the federal Lanham Act provides a process for registering marks and federal jurisdiction over litigation about them. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 1:18 pm
The report identified and analyzed the barriers to remedy in the United States, Canada, and Europe, setting out detailed recommendations for the actions States should take to address these barriers. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 5:06 pm
United States Trust Company, in its brief, asserts that there is no reported case in this jurisdiction in which a corporate fiduciary has been removed as an executor of an estate, and no such case has been brought to the attention of this Court by any other party. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:51 pm by Florian Mueller
The Supreme Court of the United States is concerned with proper interpretation of what Congress decides, and not with making policy judgments for Congress.I'm not going to discuss the frequently-cited SAS Institute v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 6:37 am by Gritsforbreakfast
This article provides additional ammunition to bolster that case from both normative and legal perspectives.Similar concerns to those described in the article regarding impeachment material in police personnel files were raised in May at the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals' Criminal Justice Integrity Unit in the context of implementation of the Michael Morton Act. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am by Schachtman
On these facts, distinguishable from the Borman case, the trial judge gave an apportionment instruction: The trial judge, waxing professorial, charged the jury as follows regarding the apportionment of causation: “The next question, the first part of it is, ‛Is there a reasonable basis to apportion responsibility for Mr. [read post]