Search for: "SHAW V. STATE"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,145
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2014, 2:32 pm
Iskanian v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am
Finally, JURIST’s Jaclyn Belczyk covers Thursday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
Shaw, 13-897, a state-on-top habeas case that asked whether, in an ineffective assistance claim, “a state appellate court’s holding that an omitted state law issue ultimately lacked merit precludes a federal habeas court from later finding either deficient performance or prejudice” under Strickland v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:46 pm
The Privacy Policy also provided that “Shaw may disclose Customer’s Personal Information to: . . . a third party or parties.. if disclosure is required by law, in accordance PIPEDA. s.7(3)(c.1)(ii) of PIPEDA permits disclosure to a government institution that has requested the disclosure for the purpose of law enforcement and has stated its “lawful authority” for the request. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:46 pm
The Privacy Policy also provided that “Shaw may disclose Customer’s Personal Information to: . . . a third party or parties.. if disclosure is required by law, in accordance PIPEDA. s.7(3)(c.1)(ii) of PIPEDA permits disclosure to a government institution that has requested the disclosure for the purpose of law enforcement and has stated its “lawful authority” for the request. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:48 am
The investigation in this case was begun as a police investigation and the disclosure of the subscriber information arose out of the request letter sent by the police to Shaw [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
United States and Yates v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
Shaw 13-897Issue: Whether, in a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a state appellate court’s holding that an omitted state law issue ultimately lacked merit precludes a federal habeas court from later finding either deficient performance or prejudice relating to that omission under the standards of Strickland v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 6:03 am
Body: SC18207 - State v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:57 am
Take, for example, the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am
Assistance, 423 Mass 399 (1996), Lebow v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am
Assistance, 423 Mass 399 (1996), Lebow v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am
Shaw & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am
Shaw & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm
Citing Shaw v Reno (509 U.S. 630, 1993), he asserted that, in cautioning against impermissible racial stereotypes, the Supreme Court has rejected the assumption that all individuals of the same race think alike, but that proposition would be a necessary beginning point were the Seattle formulation to control. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 11:59 am
” Murphy v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 12:52 pm
Dukes (which we blogged about here and here) and DFEH v. [read post]
