Search for: "SMITH v. STATE" Results 701 - 720 of 9,944
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2015, 11:54 am
 A round that doesn't include any state or federal habeas proceedings.Is it really worth it to try again? [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:08 pm by nflatow
Epps goes on to explain that the very same decision that established judicial review, Marbury v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:35 am by Adam Wagner
In fact, Smith v Oxfordshire involved the same “Smith” as in this particular case. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ltd., saying there was no court order for Philips to violate. link: http://www.law360.com/articles/719323/reed-smith-philips-shake-sanctions-bid-in-trade-secret-rowAlso of interestBut Philips argued that all of the information it used in its state court suit came from publicly available or permissible sources, calling the motion no more than an attempt to keep facts in the federal case from making it into the state case. [read post]