Search for: "STATE v. HEAD"
Results 701 - 720
of 14,951
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2023, 11:26 am
Woolf v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 9:10 am
On this note, it is very interesting to review the Texas case of Strickland v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:54 am
" In practice, it's hard to find cases where such a standard would likely change the outcome; but Thursday's Washington Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 11:06 am
Arnold v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 8:57 am
Tsakopoulos Investments, LLC v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:14 am
See Connick v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
United States, and United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 2:57 pm
If signed by the Governor, this legislation would codify the 2008 California Supreme Court decision in Edwards v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 5:47 am
Turning to recent actions, the July decision in SEC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 3:11 am
In the case of Courvoisier v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 11:30 am
In this regard, Peruvian authors such as José Luis Gil, former head of the Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of the Interior, considered the lawsuit filed in favour of Víctor Polay Campos to be part of a mechanism used by those convicted of terrorism to obtain undue benefits, specifically financial compensation. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:42 am
My head just exploded . . . [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
And finally, in the most recent C-204/21 Commission v Poland, the Court asserted its authority in the strongest possible terms by proclaiming that, “the review of Member States’ compliance with the requirements arising from Article 2[…] TEU falls fully within the jurisdiction of the Court” (para. 62), and that Article 2 TEU is not merely a statement of policy guidelines or intentions, but rather “contains values which are an integral part of the… [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 5:50 pm
"] From today's decision in Fairstein v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 11:41 am
Alsenz v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 8:07 am
Curtis was shot in the head and died from his […] The post WILLIAM LLOYD MCDONALD v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
[I will blog the NetChoice v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
The result of this narrow interpretation of hostilities by successive U.S. administrations has turned the constitutional order on its head—requiring Congress to muster supermajorities in both houses to stop U.S. involvement in a war rather than requiring the president to seek the support of Congress to start one. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 12:56 pm
Flames shoot out of the head of the guy in the electric chair. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
The department head did not deny this suggestion. [read post]