Search for: "STATE v. VIGIL"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2015, 9:45 am
In a victory for California businesses, the 2nd District Court of Appeal has ruled in an unpublished opinion that on-call rest periods are lawful. 2nd Appellate Court Ruling In Jennifer Augustus, et al. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 7:31 pm
Justice Dickson stated in R. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 6:43 am
It’s critical for loved ones to be vigilant and speak up if they fear a mistake has been made. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:59 pm
The Supreme Court relied on its 1995 decision in the case of United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:24 pm
In United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
In Paroline v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
Thus, said the court, ECSO was not required under the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 USC §12101 et seq.) or the New York State Human Rights Law (Executive Law §296) to accommodate her disability by creating such a light duty position for her.* See also County of Erie v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2014 NY Slip Op 07829, Appellate Division, Fourth Department** Executive Law §296(3)(b) requires employers to make reasonable accommodations to permit… [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
[v] The appearance of such proposal is that of a solution to all parts of the problem, when in fact it can have no effect upon the cost of legal advice services. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:54 am
" United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 5:08 am
This is why nursing home medical professionals and staffers must be vigilant when it comes to sterilization and other procedures in order to prevent unwitting spread of the virus. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:15 pm
Vincent Forcier v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
Sep. 29, 2014); Tyree v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 2:40 pm
This brings the policy into line with the United States, UK, Canada and Ireland. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:02 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
Will the Real Evidence-Based Ebola Policy Please Stand Up? Seven Takeaways From Maine DHHS v. Hickox
6 Nov 2014, 8:44 am
The case I mentioned in my last post, Maine Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 7:07 pm
” According to Senior Vice President and General Counsel for Koch Industries, Inc., Mark V. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
In the first case, Mellouli v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 2:32 am
The Saturday order, for which a number of news organizations had kept a vigil through the night in anticipation of its release, did not disclose how six of the Justices had voted. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:20 pm
While cases of voluntary adoptions designed to thwart the requirements of ICWA require constant vigilance from states and tribes, the law provides broader protections for those families in the state child welfare system. [read post]
