Search for: "Separation Engineers, Inc." Results 701 - 720 of 1,220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
-> Data breaches are taking longer to identify, says report -> Website can use DMCA safe harbor for acts of its independent contractors -> Investment Disputes: The Mesa Power Case and What It Says -> Copyright Law Developments Of 2015 – Intellectual Property -> U.S. keeps China, India on intellectual property shame list -> Federal Cause of Action for Trade Secret Misappropriation -> Court doesn't enforce website terms, RESORB NETWORKS, INC. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 3:51 am
Google and Tiger then filed separate appeals before the Cour de cassation, which referred three questions to the Court for a preliminary ruling. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:04 pm by WIMS
Army Corps of Engineers and the City of Chicago, et al. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 6:44 pm
Duffy* [PDF Version (42 KB)]             The Patent and Trademark Office has now made clear that its newly developed position on patentable subject matter will invalidate many and perhaps most software patents, including pioneering patent claims to such innovators as Google, Inc. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 5:46 pm by Steven Taber
Honeywell gets FAA okay on runway safety systems.The Federal Aviation Administration has greenlighted Honeywell International Inc. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Google Chrome EULA – Controversy over non-exclusive license clause permitting Google to use content submitted through the service: (IP Thinktank), (BriefBlog), (Copyfight), (Copyfight), (The Trademark Blog), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (IPKat), US presidential campaigns clash on patent law: (Out-Law), (IAM), (Anything… [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom battle:… [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 4:26 pm by Morris Turek
  The first opposition was filed by The Laptop Company, Inc. on October 28, 2009. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 12:23 pm
Separately, consumer group Public Citizen argued in a letter that the company and agency should have taken action sooner. [read post]