Search for: "Shaw v. Shaw"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,638
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2008, 4:44 am
Nash in New York County adopts the Second Department's holding: "Public policy dictates that courts pay particular attention to fee arrangements between attorneys and their clients, as it is important that a fee contract be fair, reasonable, and fully known and understood by the client (see Jacobson v Sassower, 66 NY2d 991, 993, 499 NYS2d 381, 489 NE2d 1283 [1985]; Shaw v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 68 NY2d 172, 176, 507 NYS2d 610, 499 NE2d 864 [1986];… [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 8:29 pm
Wen Mei Lu v City of Saratoga Springs, 2018 WL 2973744 (NYAD 3 Dept. 6/17/2018) [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
Mueller 258,875 James V. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:46 am
In Shaw v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 12:01 pm
In today’s case (Private Career Training Institutions Agency v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 8:00 am
Mueller — — — — — James V. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:48 am
Nelsen v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 6:40 am
In Garfield v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 6:40 am
In Garfield v. [read post]
14 May 2022, 6:31 am
In Sorenson Impact Foundation v. [read post]
14 May 2022, 6:31 am
In Sorenson Impact Foundation v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 5:12 am
In McElrath v. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:45 am
Amy Howe reports for this blog, in a post that first appeared at Howe on the Court, that after announcing in the wake of the court’s decision in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 4:01 pm
I promise I’m not trying to beat you over the head with Sackett v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 3:49 am
Recently in Waugh Chapel South, LLC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 11:06 am
By Ming Henderson and Razia Begum With the increasing number of disputes and client queries regarding confidential information in the United Kingdom, the recent case of Personnel Hygiene Services Ltd & ors v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:30 am
Connecticut and Eisenstadt v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:35 pm
Schulze and Shaw, (1962) 32 D.L.R. (2d) 171 (Man. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:28 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 10:01 am
Shaw recommended an import ban, though he also recommended that it "be delayed by 12 months" in order to "mitigate its effects on third parties" by giving the respondents sufficient time not only to develop workaround products but also to have them (re-)certified. [read post]