Search for: "Shorter v. State"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2012, 3:04 pm
ACCOUNT STATED – 6 YEARS (N.J. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 12:38 pm
Gates, 06-1197, and Parhat v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:12 am
Second, expense for both parties likely will be minimized if the process is shorter rather than longer. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:12 am
Second, expense for both parties likely will be minimized if the process is shorter rather than longer. [read post]
27 May 2014, 8:49 am
Beckon * Employee Blogging Risks * Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:14 am
Corp. v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:42 am
Mr E's further submissions that not enough attention had been paid to Mr Nuweke's evidence got even shorter shrift. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:42 am
Mr E's further submissions that not enough attention had been paid to Mr Nuweke's evidence got even shorter shrift. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 7:08 pm
See O’Connor v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 6:34 pm
Performance data should be customized to the indications for use, including the specific intended patient population (adult vs. pediatric), disease state, conditions of use, and the target anatomical location. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:19 am
OSEP has clarified that a state may adopt a statute of limitations either shorter or longer than two years by statute or regulation, but not by common law, subject to the notification provisions of IDEA. 71 Fed. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
A shorter version of this article originally appeared in the February 3, 21012 edition of Lawyers Weekly Magazine. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 9:13 am
Pittenger and Wolman v Walters.These two cases held that the only educational equipment and materials that states could provide to children in religious schools were secular textbooks. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
The excellent questions raised show how fertile a field this is for scholars to till.A few years ago, David Congdon, now the Senior Editor at Kansas, told us it was a high priority of his to issue a book on United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
The application is valid for one year from the date of approval of the application for recordation or for the time of validity of the intellectual property right, whichever is shorter. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:23 am
Following the recent CJEU decisions in Case C-617/15(Hummel v Nike, reported in various places including here) and joined Cases C-24/16 and C-25/16 (Nintendo v BigBen Interactive, reported on this very blawg), the English court’s decision in Poul Chang Metal Industry Company Ltd v Bailcast Ltd and Anor [2018] EWHC 3432 (Ch) has just become available. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 12:21 pm
USPTO’s interim procedures for patent term extensions: Last week the AmeriKat reported on the important decision of Wyeth v Kappos which held that the USPTO misapplied patent term calculations resulting in shorter patent terms for patentees than what they should have been. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 11:27 am
However, the plaintiffs in International Franchise Association, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 1:35 pm
This post has some remarks on my own session, some shorter remarks on the session I chaired, and some even shorter remarks on the final session of the day. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:50 pm
See, e.g., Callejas v. [read post]
