Search for: "Shorts v. Superior Court" Results 701 - 720 of 1,668
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2023, 12:28 pm by Orin S. Kerr
The New Jersey Supreme Court also has an important case pending on the meaning of intercept involving review of the Superior Court's decision in Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:03 am by Bruce E. Boyden
When I was in my first semester of law school, I was given a short memo assignment involving some principle of Connecticut contract law. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:15 am by 1 Crown Office Row
That reality was one in which the State should benefit from a wide margin of appreciation; in short, it was not for the Court as an international court to find a violation. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:40 am
`The prime concern’ in deciding Rule 45(f) transfer motions `should be avoiding burdens on local nonparties subject to subpoenas, and it should not be assumed that the issuing court is in a superior position to resolve subpoena-related motions. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:05 am by Bexis
  The Supreme Court, without re-examining the evidence, affirmed after concluding that the Superior Court more or less got the standard correct. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am by Eugene Volokh
From Wednesday's California Court of Appeal decision in Firefighters4Freedom v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am by John Elwood
Superior Court, alleging that Simberg’s and Steyn’s commentary defamed him. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 11:05 am
Supreme Court's unanimous opinion in the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 6:50 am
He tried to pull her shorts down. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:06 am
 The officers pursued the defendant to the right, but lost sight of him during the chase for a short time. [read post]
5 May 2014, 10:10 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
To decide when the cause of action arose, the Pennsylvania Superior Court found that a cause of action did indeed arise when the injury occurred. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm by MOTP
In short, we hold that the developer must arbitrate its claims against the general contractor but not its claims against the other defendants. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:06 pm by Dan Michaluk
Johnson Controls Ltd., 2002 CanLII 14053 (ON S.C.), Cameron J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice said: There is no evidence of any document retention or destruction policy. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 4:05 pm
The Plaintiffs obtained an immediate Temporary Restraining Order in Mecklenburg County from Superior Court Judge Robert Johnston on Sunday, October 5th. [read post]