Search for: "State v. Hatch"
Results 701 - 720
of 776
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am
Because those are federal statutes, they can’t be “preempted” the way state-law claims were in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Furthermore, in paragraph 182 of its judgment in Prosecutor v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:00 pm
[1] Complaint at 1-2, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
Leining v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:57 am
See also United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:46 am
Van Orden v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 10:53 am
The Supreme Court will resolve that question in Heffernan v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
State Bd. of Exam'rs. of Pub. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:00 am
As with so many Hatch-Waxman 180-day exclusivity cases, it’s complicated. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 12:02 pm
That is what the Supreme Court said as well in Hamdi v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 4:34 am
” For example, in Fiore v Oakwood Plaza Shopping Ctr., Inc. (164 AD2d 737 [1st Dept 1991], affd 78 NY2d 572 [1991]), the Court ruled that an out-of-state judgment by confession is entitled to accelerated treatment under CPLR 3213. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 12:46 pm
The decision in Caraco v. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 3:00 pm
In Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:30 am
In the Second Circuit, there is a case called Cheeks v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 10:42 am
In my essay, I suggest that Skinner v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:00 am
So the researchers hypothesized that these awake ripple states are required for memory-guided decision-making. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 8:19 am
Hatch, Joseph DePadilla and Brian J. [read post]
