Justia Blawg Search - Law Blogs, Lawyer Blogs, Legal Blogs Directory & Search Engine

US Supreme Court rules on life imprisonment for juveniles

24 Apr 2021, 6:34 am by Ryan House | U. Pittsburgh School of Law, US

The US Supreme Court ruled Thursday in Jones v. [read post]

JURIST - Paper Chase - http://www.jurist.org/paperchase/

The Business Implications of the U.S. v Jones CPS Tracking Decision

24 Jan 2012, 9:43 am by Chanley T. Howell

The Jones decision reinforces the notion that tracking information, even when the tracking occurs in public places, is subject to Constitutional protection under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]

Privacy & Security Source - http://www.privacysecuritysource.com

Commonwealth v. Jones, SJC-12564 (Mass. Mar. 6, 2019)

17 Dec 2021, 11:43 am by KLG PDF Import

Key Insight: Whether compelling the defendant to enter his cell phone password would violate his privilege against self incrimination under 5th Amendment and art. 12 of Mass Declaration of Rights Nature of Case: Trafficking a person for sexual servitude Electronic Data Involved: data held on cell phone Keywords: Cell phone password, 5th Amendment Identified State […] [read post]

Electronic Discovery Law - http://www.ediscoverylaw.com/

BAILII: Recent Decisions

31 Mar 2011, 4:08 am by traceydennis

Supreme Court Duncombe & Ors v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] UKSC 14 (29 March 2011) Jones v Kaney [2011] UKSC 13 (29 March 2011) Lumba (WL) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12 (23 March 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Folgate London Market Ltd v Chaucer Insurance Plc [2011] EWCA Civ 328 (31 March 2011) W (Children) [2011] EWCA Civ 345 (30 March 2011) Societe… [read post]

Current Awareness Weblog - http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com

By a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court holds that a federal prisoner who has already filed (and exhausted) a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 can’t file another postconviction motion to raise a claim of legal innocence based on an intervening statutory-interpretation-decision of the Supreme Court. Section 2255(h) bars second or successive 2255 motions based on non-constitutional claims; and the “saving clause” of § 2255(e) doesn’t authorize a petition for a “writ of habeas corpus,” under § 2241, for claims barred by § 2255(h). Jones v. Hendrix, Sup. Ct. 21-857, __U.S.. __ (June 22, 2023).

27 Jun 2023, 12:31 pm by Darrell Fields

Jones v. [read post]

Federal Defenders of New York Blog - http://blog.federaldefendersny.org/

Corporate Farming Articles and the Nebraska Constitution

29 Jan 2010, 12:32 pm by Anthony Schutz

Gale.Here is a recent article from the Nebraska Law Review in which I critically examine the court's opinion in Jones v. [read post]

Agricultural Law - http://aglaw.blogspot.com/

When "the Government trespassorily inserted the information-gathering device" on a car, it was a search within the meaning of the 4th Amendment.

23 Jan 2012, 10:03 am

Says the Supreme Court, this morning, in United States v. [read post]