Search for: "State v. Lloyd"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2011, 1:22 am
The August 5 Opinion On appeal, Citigroup attempted to rely on the holding of Zeig v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 10:00 pm
Regina v Budimir and another; Interfact Ltd v Liverpool City Council [2010] EWCA Crim 148; [2010] EWHC 1604 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 166 CA and DC: Lord Judge CJ, David Clarke, Lloyd Jones JJ: 29 June 2010 – read judgment A new High Court decision has struck a blow for legal certainty and enforced the sometimes forgotten right under human rights law against retrospective criminal sanctions, which applies even in cases where the UK had failed to enact European… [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 5:09 am
State Farm Lloyds, 2014 WL 2854536, No. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 2:22 pm
Lloyd v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 3:43 pm
Illinois Department of Labor v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Manchester Building Society (Appellant) v Grant Thornton UK LLP (Respondent), heard 13-14 October 2020 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others… [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 10:36 am
The significance of this case should also be considered alongside the Court of Appeal’s judgment in another data protection-related claim, Richard Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599 (“Lloyd”) (see our summary of that decision here). [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:33 am
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, 59 Mass. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
The Fredericksburg Care Company LP v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:45 pm
Lloyd recommended that the case be dismissed. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:31 am
—Harper Lee in “To Kill a Mockingbird” 1Certain Underwriters at Lloyds’, London v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court case, Lucia v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:17 am
" In Christine and Lloyd Overton v. [read post]
Frenemies at Last?: How Legislative History Could Save Justice Kavanaugh’s Opinion in Azar v. Allina
13 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
Yet, in Azar v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm
In Guedes v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:16 am
Lord Hodge who gave the only judgment (with which Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Leggatt, Lord Burrows and Lady Rose agreed) stated (at [33]): “.. the purpose of section 471(3) is to circumvent the difficult issues that can arise in the application of section 471(1). [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
”[6] The court’s stated standard is much less interesting than its reasoning process, which goes 2020. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:35 am
State Water Resources Control Board, Judge Lloyd Connelly of the Sacramento Superior Court issued a ruling on the issues on December 2, 2011 as follows. [read post]
