Search for: "State v. Rice" Results 701 - 720 of 997
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2012, 11:31 am by Susan Brenner
As the Court of Appeals noted, United States Secret Service Agent William Slavoski filed a civil rights complaint (pursuant to 42 U.S.Code § 1983) against employees of the Pennsylvania State Police (`PSP’), including Commissioner Frank Pawlowski, Mervin Rodriguez, John Rice, Francis Hacken, Bryon Devlin, Willard Oliphant, Huascar Rivera, and Pedro Rivera (collectively `Defendants’). [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:02 pm
"And:In June, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Attorney General Michael Mukasey asked Texas Gov. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Guest Opinion
Our own experiences in supermarkets show that along with the shelves that held flour, rice and beans, the shelves that held crackers, chips, ramen noodles, soda, sugary cereals, and processed ready to eat meals are quite empty”. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
On 22 March 2024, there was a remedies hearing before Collins Rice J in Blake v Fox QB-2021-001248. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kevin
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco:  Michael M ____ v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Supreme Court ruling in "Quon" highlights importance of employer technology-usage and privacy policiesPrepared by Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLPOn June 17, 2010, the United States Supreme Court unanimously decided City of Ontario v. [read post]