Search for: "State v. Royal" Results 701 - 720 of 1,998
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2018, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
” At Law.com, Marcia Coyle reports that in a “rare, ‘uninvited’” amicus brief asking the Supreme Court to grant cert in Royal v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 12:53 am by JEMIMA LOVATT
“The NHS Plan: The Government’s Response to the Royal Commission on Long Term Care”, s 2.11 states that nursing care should be provided free of charge and that “the NHS will meet the costs of required nurse time spent on providing, delegating or supervising care in any setting”. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The Divisional Court considered the construction of each policy wording and the FCA, the Appellant Insurers and the Hiscox Interveners appeal on a number of points On Monday 16 November, the Supreme Court will also hear the appeal of Robinson (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for Home Department. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:25 pm
I sat for a few hours in the Atlanta airport last night during a thunder storm so had some time to finish up my PowerPoint for my speech in a few weeks in London before the Royal Society for Public Health. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Sharon Bradford Franklin
On Feb. 27, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
Prince Harry’s barrister, David Sherborne also cross-examined the Mirror’s former royal correspondent, Jane Kerr, who authored 10 of the 33 articles alleged to have come from illegal sources. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:03 pm by John Bellinger
In a surprising development, less than a week after last Tuesday’s oral argument in Kiobel v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:39 am by INFORRM
Remarkably, the list stated that NGN had not searched for documents contained on or created by NGN’s computer equipment. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:21 am
 Continuing the saga of Cautious v IPOff and the Case of the Robot Octopus, it awaits your pleasure here. [read post]