Search for: "State v. Tims" Results 701 - 720 of 1,362
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2015, 2:55 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Daniel Tims, No. 109,472 (Jackson)State appeal (petition for review)Kevin P. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:47 am by Joe Consumer
  Writes Liptak, The case on commercial speech, Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 2:33 pm
Outros autores a desenvolveram, mas o fato é que no século XXI a formulação teórica de Von Bertalanffy, atende a várias ciências. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
It is nothing less than the first public response of any national office to the current EPO unrest.* The burden of proof in "double identity" trade mark disputes: rising to the Supreme challengeAfter his earlier note on Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd, Jeremy hosts this post of guest contributor Tim Behean(Sipara, Oxford), which focuses on just one aspect of this multifaceted ruling: burden of proof in so-called "double identity"… [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:53 am by Cody Poplin
In Syria, the Islamic State released 19 of the recently captured Assyrian Christians. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:18 am
In this litigation funded by rabbit food, the costs will certainly not be chicken feed.Later today this weblog will be hosting a comment on this decision from Katfriend Tim Behean, so watch this space! [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014]… [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 2:30 am
 Be that as it may, here's Tim's take on what Arnold J's decision has achieved, how they go about dealing with the same phenomenon in the United States -- and where we might go from here:Richemont v BskyB and others: a national solution to a global problem? [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 12:48 pm by Kali Borkoski
On February 13 the State & Local Legal Center will host a webinar on T-Moble v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
Tim Carpenter  (D-Milwaukee) introduced a bill that he thinks makes his state at least the ninth to actively consider a ban on “Pacohol” before it ever reaches consumers. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:32 am by SHG
People v Tims, 449 Mich 83, 95, 99, 103-104; 534 NW2d 675 (1995). [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 1:33 am
It's free but you still have to email Tim Coppen here to tell him that you'd like to attend.LinkedIn round-up. [read post]